Talk:Geneva (typeface)

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Helvetica?

I know my Helvetica, and I don't see how this could possibly be a reworking of it as the article states. Instead, it looks a bit more like Univers, if anything. jr98664 23:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Versions of Geneva?

I've been printing lists of fonts I have installed on my computers at work (Windows) and home (Mac) and noticed that Geneva on the Mac looks quite different from the specimen given here. The 'G' doesn't have the horizontal stroke and the 'a' has more of a tail. It looks very similar to Lucida Grande. I'm going to double-check that it wasn't just a glitch in the PDF I made and sent to myself to print, but that's what I'm seeing now.

Also, any suggestions for good (free) tools to investigate the metadata stored in these fonts to determine which versions I have, exactly? On XP I'm justing using the system's font viewer. On OS X I have the system's font viewer and Linotype's FontExplorer. ⇔ ChristTrekker 15:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]